Teams

Cornelius - Cornucopia Combo

2025 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-12-07vs Smith - Mix & MatchmakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeah Jones / Brice Rhee vs Oona Schmid / Antigone Potamianos0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSanam Boroumand / Barbara McCluer vs Stacey White / Wendy Wicker7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSally Blatz / Shannon Thomas vs Erin Nguyen / Louise Smith0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Megan Rappolt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Leah Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Shannon Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Margueritte Harlow
published
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.77
Grace Wei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Brice Rhee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Sanam Boroumand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Lindsey Trickett
published
2.50
Krystal Lewis
published
2.45
Barbara McCluer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Katherine Aizpuru
published
Coline Dony
published 2.5
2.16
Sally Blatz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Thomas + Barbara McCluer4248% games+0.3% vs expected
Shannon Thomas + Leah Jones033 matchesnot enough data
Barbara McCluer + Margueritte Harlow213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Aizpuru + Sally Blatz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Rappolt
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Leah Jones
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Shannon Thomas
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Margueritte Harlow
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Grace Wei
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brice Rhee
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Sanam Boroumand
7W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Lindsey Trickett
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Krystal Lewis
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Barbara McCluer
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Katherine Aizpuru
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Coline Dony
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Blatz
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.