← Teams

MPRC-Monsantofils

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Floyd Grant
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.57
Eric Goldner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Tim Brink
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Gates
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results12 ties
2023-09-24Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Robert Fowler vs Jeffrey Nomi / Kevin Cahoon6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJack Schunk / Tim Brink vs Vincent La Cava / John Popplewell6-2, 6-2
2023-09-23Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesRobert Fowler / Floyd Grant vs Ronald Beresky / Terry Wright6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Schunk / Tim Brink vs Randy Litch / Jeff Engle6-1, 6-0
2023-09-22Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJack Schunk / Tim Brink vs Kirk Candioglos / Tom Wimberly6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Fowler / Floyd Grant vs James Hoesly / Greg Everson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Robert Fowler vs Douglas Powrie / Peter Rysavy6-0, 6-2
2022-11-13Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Gates / Gary Willihnganz vs Patrick Harkin / Sam Aiello6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Goldner / Craig Strauser vs Deepak Kumar / Steven Keo6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-11-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesGary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates vs Ken Nichols / John Droege6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Monsantofils / Floyd Grant vs Terence Gariety / Gary Chin6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Eric Cooley vs Steven Wilker / William Malloch6-4, 6-4
2022-10-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesGary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates vs Lance Berkey / Tom Lonergan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Steve Carns / Ken Crowley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFloyd Grant / Eric Goldner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPeter Monsantofils / Floyd Grant vs Robert Ferek / Jim Wheeler6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates vs Len Morales / John Christiaan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPerry Sides / Tim Brink vs Tony Khamsouk / Scott Anderson6-1, 6-3
2022-10-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPeter Monsantofils / Floyd Grant vs James Ringelberg / Todd Eckelman6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTim Brink / Eric Cooley vs Kevin Pedigo / William Hergenhan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Gates / Charlie Dolezal vs Christopher Graham / Rudy Martinez6-2, 6-0
2022-10-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesEric Cooley / Floyd Grant vs Jonathan Barg / Donald Brenneman7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCharlie Dolezal / Jeffrey Gates vs William Campbell / Kit Johnson5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Brink / Paul Stutzman vs Jeffrey Krum / Tim Leatherman7-6, 6-0
2022-09-18Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs Shung Shin / Francisco Rivera-Giusti6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Brink / Eric Goldner vs Rymn Parsons / Jim Hamlik6-4, 7-5
2022-09-10Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesEric Cooley / Floyd Grant vs Alex Pulaski / David Meisels6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPerry Sides / Jeffrey Gates vs Jeroen Swanborn / Joseph Collins6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Floyd Grant
44W–32L career
15%85%0%
3.64
4
Eric Goldner
30W–18L career
26%74%0%
3.57
3.5
Tim Brink
43W–26L career · type A
3%85%12%
3.35
3.5
Jeffrey Gates
102W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.