Teams

LA - Court Justice

2023 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-21vs LA-LLW-Mulholland-Kamall ShaikhLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Brooks / Erik Marroquin vs Andrew Brunswick / Aaron Meyerson3-6, 2-6
2023-10-01vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Brooks / Erik Marroquin vs Theodore Zhu / Jonathan Juhn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-17vs LA - Queen Anne KingsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTae Chi / Erik Marroquin vs Nick Garfinkle / Nigel Lizaranzu6-0, 6-3
2023-09-09vs LA - MountainGate GatorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPhilip Brooks / Erik Marroquin vs Bruce Hofert / Jamie Murphy6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Erik Marroquin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Curtis Thompson
published 4
3.65
Nigel Lawes
published
3.64
Edward Wedding
published
3.49
Aditya Agarkar
published 4
3.48
Philip Brooks
published
3.35
Norman Jones
published
3.23
George Moore
published
KJ Park
published
Luis Munoz
published
Madan Murali
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erik Marroquin
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Curtis Thompson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Nigel Lawes
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Edward Wedding
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Aditya Agarkar
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Philip Brooks
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Norman Jones
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.35
George Moore
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.23
KJ Park
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Luis Munoz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Madan Murali
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.