Teams

Pink Power

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-14vs Dare Doubles 1Split 11
W#1 DoublesMasako Murphy / Holly Hill vs Elizabeth Mishev / Elizabeth Mehl7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSylvia Okala / Rosalie Hooper vs Janice Sheppard / Carol Olaughlin3-6, 5-7
2024-06-07vs Dare Doubles 1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Masako Murphy vs Tami Burt / Shelly Frederick7-6, 3-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Pugh / Mary Corbiere vs Carol Olaughlin / Mesanie Lee1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Gillian Moorhead vs Elizabeth Mishev / Mary Cepko6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2024-05-31vs Dare Doubles 1Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Masako Murphy vs Elizabeth Mishev / Elizabeth Mehl7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Rosalie Hooper vs Mary Ann Stein / Shelly Frederick6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-24vs Dare Doubles 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Diana Everline vs Carol Olaughlin / Shelly Frederick6-7, 4-5
W#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Rosalie Hooper vs Elizabeth Mehl / Andrea Perotti6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Pugh / Mary Corbiere vs Deborah Alban / Jean Legal6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-17vs Dare Doubles 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Holly Hill vs Tami Burt / Shelly Frederick6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Diana Everline vs Lisa Seamancrawford / Martha van Cleve6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-10vs Dare Doubles 1Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Holly Hill vs Carol Olaughlin / Martha van Cleve6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-03vs Dare Doubles 1Won 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Pugh / Mary Corbiere vs Elizabeth Mishev / Janice Sheppard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Masako Murphy vs Carol Olaughlin / Tami Burt6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiana Everline / Nancy Rase vs Andrea Perotti / Mary Ann Stein2-6, 2-6
2024-04-26vs Dare Doubles 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Everline / Laila Cofield vs Carol Olaughlin / Lisa Seamancrawford4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Pugh / Mary Corbiere vs Elizabeth Mehl / Mesanie Lee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Cindy Mexcur vs Andrea Perotti / Deborah Alban7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-19vs Dare Doubles 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Masako Murphy vs Deborah Alban / Mary Cepko6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Catherine Herbert vs Lisa Seamancrawford / Clara Ochipinti3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Maria Birnkammer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.38
Deborah Pugh
published 3.5
3.35
Cindy Mexcur
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.34
Holly Hill
published
3.32
Gillian Moorhead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Rosalie Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Diana Everline
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Nancy Rase
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Masako Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.08
Sylvia Okala
published
2.59
Mary Corbiere
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Laila Cofield
published
Patricia Weston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Masako Murphy + Maria Birnkammer11258% gamesnot enough data
Diana Everline + Nancy Rase5748% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Weston + Sylvia Okala4353% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Masako Murphy3450% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Maria Birnkammer4356% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Pugh + Laila Cofield3259% gamesnot enough data
Diana Everline + Rosalie Hooper134 matchesnot enough data
Rosalie Hooper + Nancy Rase123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maria Birnkammer
97W–141L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Deborah Pugh
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–156L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Holly Hill
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Gillian Moorhead
168W–147L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Diana Everline
23W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Nancy Rase
43W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Masako Murphy
130W–138L career · 11 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sylvia Okala
40W–35L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Catherine Herbert
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Mary Corbiere
67W–148L career · 4 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
Laila Cofield
28W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Weston
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.