Teams

Vraalag

2025 55 & Over Mixed · 8.0 55 & Over Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs Montana/Miller 55&OverMXWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaige Darden / James Shaffer vs Bruce Hazeltine / Sue Clark6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnn Jackson / Peter Teal vs Kimimi Ashley / Jamie Armstrong0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Waters / Thomas Shea vs Gatchina Hessler / Andrew Lenssen7-5, 6-1
2025-11-09vs Montana/Miller 55&OverMXLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Jackson / Dennis Vap vs Jamie Armstrong / Kimimi Ashley0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Darden / Dana Miller vs Bruce Hazeltine / Sue Clark6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCyndy Desin / Jimmy Vroman vs Britt Olander / Sarah Miller5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-08vs Montana/Miller 55&OverMXWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Jackson / Peter Teal vs Jamie Armstrong / Kimimi Ashley2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Darden / James Shaffer vs Bruce Hazeltine / Sue Clark6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Waters / Thomas Shea vs Gatchina Hessler / Andrew Lenssen6-0, 6-1
2025-11-08vs Montana/Miller 55&OverMXLost 12
W#1 DoublesCyndy Desin / Jimmy Vroman vs Britt Olander / Sarah Miller6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnn Jackson / Dennis Vap vs Kimimi Ashley / Jamie Armstrong0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Darden / Dana Miller vs Sue Clark / Bruce Hazeltine2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 55 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Ann Waters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dana Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Dennis Vap
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Peter Teal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Thomas Shea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Jimmy Vroman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ann Jackson
published 3.5
3.19
James Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Paige Darden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Waters
25W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Dana Miller
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dennis Vap
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Peter Teal
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Thomas Shea
14W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jimmy Vroman
22W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Ann Jackson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
James Shaffer
47W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
Paige Darden
23W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.