Teams

RTC MERKLIN

2024 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall - Men N

24 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall - Men N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Thomas Fagley
published
3.79
Saurin Patel
published
3.79
Saurin Patel
published
Brandon Sheppard
published 4
3.73
Andrew Thompson
published 4
3.56
Cory Thomas
published 3.5
3.52
Vaughn Deary
published
3.37
Mike Deleonardis
published
3.34
Safwan Hallab
published
3.33
Ryan Rich
published
3.27
Miguel Francis
published
Armando Reyes
published 3.5
3.24
Doug French
published
3.12
Bo Moseley
published 3.5
3.12
2.85
Troy Merklin
published
2.85
Troy Merklin
published
Michael Dix
published
Michael Lewis
published
Michael Lewis
published
Ron Reiling
published
Tom Rockwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug French + Safwan Hallab5452% games+2.3% vs expected
Ryan Rich + Safwan Hallab4351% games−3.2% vs expected
Bo Moseley + Vaughn Deary213 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Rich + Cory Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Fagley
15W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Saurin Patel
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Saurin Patel
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brandon Sheppard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andrew Thompson
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Cory Thomas
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Vaughn Deary
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Mike Deleonardis
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.37
Safwan Hallab
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Ryan Rich
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Miguel Francis
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Armando Reyes
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chistopher Lee Isaacs
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Doug French
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Bo Moseley
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Rajasekhar Jagarlamudi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Troy Merklin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Troy Merklin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Michael Dix
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Lewis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Lewis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ron Reiling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Srinivasan Subramanian
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Rockwell
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.