Teams

Westwood-Wayland

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-23vs SCC-FranksLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Chris Gerecke vs Lauren Palmer / Brian Consolvo2-6, 3-6
2024-03-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Wayland / Bobbie Lou Oley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-09vs CCV-FraizerWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Boys / Bobbie Lou Oley vs Mindy Angel / Joseph Parker6-2, 6-1
2024-03-02vs Willow Oaks-HaleWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Chris Gerecke vs Ingrid Hale / David Harris6-2, 7-5
2024-02-18vs Burkwood-McKelveyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Chris Gerecke vs Tyler Sinsabaugh / Rebecca Loos5-7, 2-6
2024-02-10vs ACAC-FulcherLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Baxter / Bobbie Lou Oley vs Ben Hall / Dina Weddle1-6, 4-6
2024-01-27vs MAC-HuangLost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Webb / Katie Gerecke vs Donna Talamo / Adam Hamilton4-6, 1-6
2024-01-20vs ACAC-DelisioWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Boys / Bobbie Lou Oley vs Eric Hewitt / Victoria Bradt6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Michael Baxter
published
4.03
Charles Wayland
published 4.5
3.96
Matthew Boys
published
3.89
Abigail Dryden
published 4
3.82
Mary LaFratta
published
3.80
Brewster Brown
published 4
3.75
Chris Gerecke
published 4
3.75
William Pilc
published
3.73
Barbara Hassett
published 4
3.69
Bobbie Lou Oley
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.63
Jon Kilberg
published
3.61
Katie Gerecke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Chris Gilman
published 3.5
3.20
Patricia Bishop
published
Ethan Edwards
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Baxter
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.24
4.5
Charles Wayland
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
4.03
Matthew Boys
24W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Abigail Dryden
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
Mary LaFratta
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Brewster Brown
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Chris Gerecke
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
William Pilc
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Hassett
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bobbie Lou Oley
139W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Jon Kilberg
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Katie Gerecke
109W–125L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chris Gilman
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
Patricia Bishop
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Ethan Edwards
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.