Teams

GOY 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Celestial Corridon vs Christina Mohorn / Caroline Walker6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Jones / Jordan Allison vs Hilary Holderness / Ashley Vartanian3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThais Warwar / Roxanne Thomas vs Katie Breeding / Weezie Keiner6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Cheryl Rankin vs Angela Olalere / Liz Busch6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Franz / Catherine Davis vs Tara Rusiewicz / Susan Brodeur6-1, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Yates 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesCrystal Mercado / Celestial Corridon vs Stephanie Gilmer / Pamela Bilodeau6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGina Goy / Sarah Kaplan vs Leslie Sheppard / Laurie Smith6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThais Warwar / Cheryl Rankin vs Kathryn Strup / Leigh Trigilio6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKimberly Franz / Sarah Kaplan vs Charlotte Boone / Kari Eddington6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Celestial Corridon vs Elia Mavronikolas / Amy Hanson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThais Warwar / Cheryl Rankin vs Sue O'Shaughnessy / Linda Shuster7-5, 6-0
2025-08-23vs Pressley 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesCrystal Mercado / Roxanne Thomas vs Krista Pressley / Andrea Hayes6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Sarah Kaplan vs Robin Crosier / Ann Hartley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGina Goy / Celestial Corridon vs Andrea Thomas / Jennifer Klein6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Hestenes / Jordan Allison vs Betsy Harrington / Rebecca Sheppard7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesThais Warwar / Roxanne Thomas vs Julie McPherson / Jennifer Russell6-3, 6-4
2025-07-31vs Dagger 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Celestial Corridon vs LaJean Morrow Smith / Courtney Dagger7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Jordan Allison vs Jessica Huellmantel / Andrea Bushnell6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKimberly Franz / Catherine Davis vs Amy Geer / Rebecca Eaton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Crystal Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Kimberly Franz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Gina Goy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.32
Linda Hestenes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Thais Warwar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Sarah Kaplan
published
3.18
Roxanne Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Kathryn Fleihan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Celestial Corridon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
Jordan Allison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Cheryl Rankin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Catherine Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Cheryl Rankin + Thais Warwar3257% games−1.8% vs expected
Crystal Mercado + Roxanne Thomas404 matchesnot enough data
Crystal Mercado + Gina Goy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Crystal Mercado
67W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Thais Warwar
29W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Sarah Kaplan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Roxanne Thomas
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Kathryn Fleihan
30W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
Celestial Corridon
19W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Jordan Allison
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Cheryl Rankin
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Catherine Davis
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.