Teams

RID HYDE

2025 FW Ladies 18 Social Doubles Summer League · Friday morning 3.5 ladies

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-11vs RTC FRIZZELL/COOPERLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Kirkpatrick / Lauren Rao vs Gina Tallent / Marilyn Trevathan4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Henegan / Anne Albrecht vs Tracey Driver / Deena Nutt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-20vs SOAKS MERCERLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Albrecht / Brooke McWhirter vs Louise Otto / Melanie Rhodes4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Hyde / Christina Swiger vs Kim Cleary / Kristy Knowles-Acker0-6, 3-6
2025-06-06vs RC KINGLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Swiger / Andrea Evans vs Tandra Langford / Regan Landreth1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Otto / Anne Albrecht vs Mary-Alex Thacker / Caroline Jurgensen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday morning 3.5 ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Hanna Howard
published
2.97
Lauren Rao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Caroline Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Christina Swiger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Abby Henegan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Anne Albrecht
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Brooke McWhirter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lauren Hyde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Melissa Otto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Kathleen Carter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hyde + Abby Henegan3448% games+2.4% vs expected
Brooke McWhirter + Melissa Otto123 matchesnot enough data
Brooke McWhirter + Lauren Hyde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hanna Howard
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Lauren Rao
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Caroline Kirkpatrick
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Christina Swiger
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Abby Henegan
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Anne Albrecht
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Brooke McWhirter
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Lauren Hyde
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Melissa Otto
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Kathleen Carter
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.