Teams

Ambrose/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-24vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Alexander Osborne vs Jeremy Tanarungsekul / Baylor Anders1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNat Scott vs Evan Hoffman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristian McCall / Alexander Wallace vs Daniel Unger / Jason Brown3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBradley Micklewright vs Michael Nicolo5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesHoai Robinette / Michael Douglas vs Daniel Unger / Charlie Craft4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNat Scott vs Jerry Witherspoon4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Cupp / Alexander Wallace vs Jeremy Tanarungsekul / Daniel Navid1-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAlexander Osborne vs Chaz Hansen6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTimmy Ramirez Cuesta / Quinn Epperly vs Mike McCarty / Peter Osucha4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Timmy Ramirez Cuesta vs Evan Hoffman / Ryan Tuchmann1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHoai Robinette vs Baylor Anders4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlexander Osborne / Walker Moncier vs Parker Ashford / Michael Nicolo6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChristian McCall / Michael Douglas vs Cliff Herring / Daniel Unger2-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesZhenning Li / Michael Douglas vs Evan Hoffman / Ryan Tuchmann2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Timmy Ramirez Cuesta vs Cliff Herring / Charlie Craft0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesQuinn Epperly vs Chaz Hansen6-2, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatt Cupp / Zhenning Li vs Jason Brown / Charlie Craft3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNat Scott vs Ethan Eisenhauer6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristian McCall / Bradley Micklewright vs Evan Hoffman / Kyle Franklin6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrandon Chong / Lance Taylor vs Jerry Witherspoon / Daniel Navid4-6
2026-03-29vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 13
W#1 DoublesLance Taylor / Bradley Micklewright vs Jeremy Tanarungsekul / Mike McCarty7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHoai Robinette vs Ethan Eisenhauer5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesQuinn Epperly / Preston Johns vs Evan Hoffman / Kyle Franklin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Alexander Wallace vs Ryan Tuchmann / Peter Osucha4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Gosselin/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatt Cupp / Michael Douglas vs Jason Brown / Evan Hoffman5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHoai Robinette vs Baylor Anders2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWalker Moncier / Lance Taylor vs Kyle Franklin / Mike McCarty7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Trey Ambrose
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Bradley Micklewright
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.80
Joseph Vollmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Quinn Epperly
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Alexander Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
Hoai Robinette
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Jarod Regan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Christian McCall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Timmy Ramirez Cuesta
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Matt Cupp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Alex Rush
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Nat Scott
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Lance Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Zhenning Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Walker Moncier
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.28
Michael Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Preston Johns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey Ambrose
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Bradley Micklewright
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Joseph Vollmer
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Quinn Epperly
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Alexander Osborne
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Hoai Robinette
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
Jarod Regan
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Christian McCall
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Timmy Ramirez Cuesta
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Matt Cupp
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Alex Rush
11W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Nat Scott
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Lance Taylor
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
Zhenning Li
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
Walker Moncier
13W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Michael Douglas
17W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Preston Johns
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.