Teams

GJTC KMORSE

2022 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME - WS

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-21vs GJTC DSUTHERLANDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Beehler / Cheryl Bodie vs Desirae DeGeus / Claire Meil1-6, 4-6
2022-06-14vs GJTC DSUTHERLANDWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Morse / Lisa Belnap vs Stacey Marshall / Debbie Sutherland6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Beehler / Laurie Rink vs Desirae DeGeus / Mandy Harter6-2, 7-5
2022-06-07vs GJTC DSUTHERLANDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Belnap / Cheryl Bodie vs Stacey Marshall / Claire Meil6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiana Beehler / Kelly Morse vs Debbie Sutherland / Mandy Harter6-4, 6-3
2022-05-31vs GJTC DSUTHERLANDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Beehler / Laurie Rink vs Claire Meil / Debbie Sutherland4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Morse / Cheryl Bodie vs Desirae DeGeus / Mandy Harter2-6, 4-6
2022-05-24vs GJTC DSUTHERLANDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Bodie / Laurie Rink vs Debbie Sutherland / Claire Meil3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Belnap / Kelly Morse vs Stacey Marshall / Desirae DeGeus6-2, 6-1
2022-05-17vs GJTC DSUTHERLANDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Morse / Laurie Rink vs Desirae DeGeus / Mandy Harter1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLisa Belnap / Diana Beehler vs Claire Meil / Debbie Sutherland6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC KMORSE426612108
2GJTC DSUTHERLAND246612102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Lisa Belnap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Laurie Rink
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Diana Beehler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Kelly Morse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Cheryl Bodie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Beehler + Laurie Rink213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Belnap
70W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Laurie Rink
30W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Diana Beehler
27W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Kelly Morse
35W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Cheryl Bodie
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.