Teams

AStewart-Smull-SVC

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-40 & Over · 40 & Over 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-31vs KNorris-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEve Hammett / Erika Linnander vs Katie Elder / Lisa Montague1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Stewart-Smull / Katie Naftel vs Kristi Laan / Karli Eller2-6, 4-6
2025-07-28vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Langino / Melissa Coward vs Susana Harvey / Ulrike Foley0-6, 4-6
2025-07-11vs MLong-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTiffany Langino / Eve Hammett vs Susana Harvey / Ulrike Foley4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Sudzina Schut / Katie Naftel vs Wendy Hanshew / Celina Morice7-6, 7-5
2025-07-07vs RWalsh-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Erika Linnander vs Sharon Huang / Elizabeth Wyngaarden6-4, 7-5
2025-07-01vs DBaker-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Langino / Christine Sudzina Schut vs Yvonne Acker / Laurie Straube6-1, 6-2
2025-06-30vs DBaker-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEve Hammett / Tiffany Langino vs Kristin Cooley / Miho Ogura7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Kuperwasser / Katie Naftel vs Jeannette Brown / Regina Davis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-09vs RWalsh-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Langino / Eve Hammett vs Elizabeth Wyngaarden / Tracey Maurer6-3, 6-2
2025-05-19vs KNorris-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTiffany Langino / Melissa Coward vs Kelsey Norris / Lisa Montague6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristine Sudzina Schut / Cynthia Moody vs Wendy Lindberg / Michelle Trinco3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tiffany Langino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Cynthia Moody
published 3.5
3.58
Erika Linnander
published
3.54
Eve Hammett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Christine Sudzina Schut
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Coward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Katie Naftel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Anne Stephens
published 3.5
3.15
Laura Caldwell
published
3.12
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
Melinda Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Sudzina Schut + Tiffany Langino8262% games+11.5% vs expected
Christine Sudzina Schut + Melissa Coward13559% games+1.1% vs expected
Eve Hammett + Tiffany Langino452955% games−1.7% vs expected
Tiffany Langino + Melissa Coward4354% gamesnot enough data
Katie Naftel + Christine Sudzina Schut5158% gamesnot enough data
Katie Naftel + Melissa Coward3350% gamesnot enough data
Katie Naftel + Eve Hammett4162% gamesnot enough data
Eve Hammett + Melissa Coward314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
3.5
Cynthia Moody
20W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Erika Linnander
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Eve Hammett
132W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Christine Sudzina Schut
149W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Katie Naftel
57W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anne Stephens
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Laura Caldwell
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Dawn Kleinman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Allison Stewart-Smull
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melinda Wright
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.