Teams

Borg Pab's

2026 55 & OVER MEN · 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-01vs BlastWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Quetzeri / Armando Hernandez vs Benjamin Lopez / Fernando Andrade6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohn Cornelius / Ronnie Valle vs Tadd Chapman / Alec Shaw6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Benak / Moyses Garcia vs Jason Garriott / Dale Paustian6-3, 6-4
2026-02-22vs THE FORCELost 03
L#1 DoublesArmando Hernandez / Moyses Garcia vs Bodo Knochenhauer / Cecil Eager1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Cornelius / Mark Gitter vs Todd Spears / James LaLonde5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMark Brown / Ben Garza vs Lewis Chandler / Sundy Muniz6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2026-02-15vs Awesome BlossomLost 03
L#1 DoublesArmando Hernandez / Guillermo Martin del Campo vs Bobby Palmer / Raul Cardenas3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Benak / Ben Garza vs Carl Bain / R Flint Bourgeois3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Brown / John Cornelius vs Lalo Rojas / Ramon Hernandez5-7, 4-6
2026-02-08vs BlastWon 21
W#1 DoublesArmando Hernandez / Guillermo Martin del Campo vs Johnny Naranjo / Dale Paustian6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMoyses Garcia / Mark Rogers vs Bobby Berman / Benjamin Lopez4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Murray / John Cornelius vs Lee Stacy / Steven Arellano6-1, 6-1
2026-02-01vs THE FORCELost 12
L#1 DoublesArmando Hernandez / James Murray vs James LaLonde / Douglas McKee3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Chism / Alejandro Quetzeri vs Lewis Chandler / Sundy Muniz3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRonnie Valle / John Cornelius vs Cecil Eager / Andrew James1-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs BlastWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Gitter / John Cornelius vs Steven Arellano / Johnny Naranjo6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChol Chong / Ronnie Valle vs Jason Garriott / Bobby Berman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBen Garza / James Murray vs Lee Stacy / Alec Shaw6-0, 6-4
2026-01-11vs THE FORCELost 03
L#1 DoublesMoyses Garcia / Ronnie Valle vs Jeffrey Landry / Bobby Duran1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Quetzeri / Mark Brown vs Cecil Eager / James LaLonde0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesArmando Hernandez / Guillermo Martin del Campo vs Lewis Chandler / Robert Wood5-7, 4-6
2026-01-04vs Awesome BlossomLost 12
L#1 DoublesGuillermo Martin del Campo / Armando Hernandez vs Bobby Palmer / Yoav Shiloah3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Cornelius / Mark Brown vs Raul Cardenas / Lalo Rojas4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Quetzeri / Mark Rogers vs John Blair / R Flint Bourgeois2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1THE FORCE8119821196
2Awesome Blossom5316821205
3Borg Pab's35101430219
4Blast1862144302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Guillermo Martin del Campo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Chol Chong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Ben Garza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
John Cornelius
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.74
Alejandro Quetzeri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Mark Gitter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Ronnie Valle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Mark Benak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Armando Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Moyses Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Gitter + John Cornelius3352% games−3.1% vs expected
Moyses Garcia + Mark Benak224 matchesnot enough data
Guillermo Martin del Campo + Armando Hernandez134 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Quetzeri + Armando Hernandez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Guillermo Martin del Campo
19W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4
Chol Chong
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Ben Garza
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
John Cornelius
17W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Alejandro Quetzeri
18W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Mark Gitter
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Ronnie Valle
9W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Mark Benak
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Armando Hernandez
5W–18L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Moyses Garcia
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.