Teams

Renneisen - 9.0 Winter 2024

2024 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 9.0 MX (FRI)

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-23vs Hanson/ MartinsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry Reiling / Luke Elifson vs Lucas LeDoux / Shelby Anderson6-7, 4-6
2024-02-02vs Estey 9.0 18+ W24Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Kuna / Kerry Reiling vs Brittany Alexander / Abdugani Ganiev6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-12vs Humann 9.0 18+ W24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLuke Elifson / Kerry Reiling vs Marc Stingley / Suzie Heideman3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Christopher Kuna
published 5
Briana Hartmann
published 5
4.37
Jack Nazy
published
4.26
Derek Kieckhafer
published 4.5
Bridget Veldman
published 4.5
4.24
Anh Doan
published 4.5
4.19
Rachael Nazy
published
4.18
Rachel LaTour
published
4.17
Paul Kilburg
published
4.09
Cameron Sloan
published 4.5
3.93
Mary Kuna
published
3.88
Kerry Reiling
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Savannah Olson
published
3.47
Cynthia Kozloff
published 4
Luke Elifson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Kozloff + Luke Elifson7162% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Kozloff + Christopher Kuna5065% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kuna + Christopher Kuna213 matchesnot enough data
Jack Nazy + Rachael Nazy213 matchesnot enough data
Paul Kilburg + Bridget Veldman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christopher Kuna
7W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Briana Hartmann
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jack Nazy
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Derek Kieckhafer
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Bridget Veldman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Anh Doan
15W–20L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Rachael Nazy
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Rachel LaTour
30W–19L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Paul Kilburg
37W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Cameron Sloan
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.09
Mary Kuna
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.93
4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
Savannah Olson
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.67
4
Cynthia Kozloff
17W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Luke Elifson
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.