Teams

JOHNSON RANCH 40AW3.5B-DT

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5 Daytime

17 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jennifer Pagador
published
Angela Mabe
published 4
3.37
Maribel Gregory
published
3.32
Shelley Quomri
published
3.30
Nicole Roseveare
published
3.27
Jayne Abelar
published
3.26
Lauren Pugh
published
Catherine Webster
published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Weinberg
published
3.18
Margie Sasaura
published
3.16
Dahlia Zuidema
published 3.5
3.15
Patricia George
published
3.13
Kat Beilby
published
3.02
Tammi Griswold
published
3.00
Leigh McNeely
published
2.87
Chris Feusahrens
published 3.5
Paula Goldstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Pugh + Shelley Quomri5547% games−5.3% vs expected
Patricia George + Kat Beilby1441% gamesnot enough data
Tammi Griswold + Kelly Weinberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Pagador
24W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Angela Mabe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maribel Gregory
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Shelley Quomri
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Nicole Roseveare
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Jayne Abelar
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Lauren Pugh
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Webster
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Weinberg
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Margie Sasaura
25W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Dahlia Zuidema
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Patricia George
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Kat Beilby
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Tammi Griswold
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Leigh McNeely
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Chris Feusahrens
1W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
Paula Goldstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.