Teams

CTL18/HORTON/WRC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-05-25vs CTL18/CROOM/SVCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Eaker / Matthew Hyder vs Charlotte Croom / Alex Hopkins6-2, 6-1
2023-04-27vs CTL18/ALEXANDER/WRCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBran Horton / Alison Eaker vs Hans Lokodi / Teresa Ziegler3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Bran Horton
published 3.5
3.42
Cydney Donnelly
published 3.5
Bryan Jansen
published 3.5
Edward Kimbrough
published 3.5
3.25
Savanna Platt
published
3.21
Stefanie Carpenter
published
3.00
Kaden Watson
published
2.98
Mark Fochesato
published
2.85
Janet Sullivan
published
2.85
Leeanne Casper
published
2.51
Alison Eaker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.47
Meredith Horton
published
2.32
Carol Barnett
published 3
Matthew Hyder
published
Michael Guffee
published
Scott Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Sullivan + Scott Sullivan8068% games+6.0% vs expected
Cydney Donnelly + Scott Sullivan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bran Horton
85W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Cydney Donnelly
78W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Bryan Jansen
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Edward Kimbrough
16W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Savanna Platt
33W–35L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Stefanie Carpenter
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Kaden Watson
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.00
Mark Fochesato
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Janet Sullivan
84W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Leeanne Casper
60W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Alison Eaker
70W–99L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Meredith Horton
62W–90L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Carol Barnett
40W–74L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.32
Matthew Hyder
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Guffee
52W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Sullivan
87W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.