Teams

LA-LLW-Not Our Fault-Erica Perkins

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Women 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Judge / Celia Dominguez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-19vs LA - WonderwomenWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Beard / Debbie Graves vs Karin Chafetz / Joyce Rosenbaum7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Victoria Alsina vs Debra Holstein / Heidi Gibbs7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-13vs LA - Queens of the CourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Beard / Debbie Graves vs Alison King / KATHRYN DURHAM6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVictoria Alsina / Ingrid Flintoft vs Yvonne Branch / Ramona Robinson6-4, 6-4
2021-06-12vs LA - WonderwomenWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Beard / Lupe Lopez vs Karin Chafetz / Linda Layton6-1, 6-3
2021-05-29vs LA - WonderwomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Alsina / Ingrid Flintoft vs Debra Holstein / Linda Layton7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-23vs LA - Queens of the CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Alsina / Debbie Graves vs Alison King / Ramona Robinson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLupe Lopez / Suzanne Segal vs Yvonne Branch / Helen Brewer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Lisa Judge vs Paulette Mashaka / Sherryl Chaffin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Karen Beard
published
Celia Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debbie Graves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Victoria Alsina
published
3.63
Lupe Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Ingrid Flintoft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.29
Gail Scott
published 3.5
Nikki Nance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Flintoft + Debbie Graves6453% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Alsina + Ingrid Flintoft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Beard
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Celia Dominguez
58W–99L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Debbie Graves
69W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Victoria Alsina
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Lupe Lopez
149W–105L career · 2 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Ingrid Flintoft
91W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Gail Scott
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.