Teams

Payne Park Huelster

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 6.0 W Monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-21vs LWR AlsterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSony Martinez / Sheryl King vs Sharon Frank / DENISE NEVILLE5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Stasiak / Nancy Lagnese vs Maria Corpina / Lynne Bouton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-03vs SSC Grossman 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Huelster / Sheryl King vs Patricia Carothers / Lori Ann Seguin6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSony Martinez / Nancy Lagnese vs Cindy Connelly / Mary Scott3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Green / Maureen Curtin vs Laurie Ramocki / Eileen Grossman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Sarasota/Pluss/55&Over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSony Martinez / Prentiss McNeill vs Lois Karran / Johane Aertker3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Cloud / Pamela Huelster vs Jana Bekavac / Jennifer Esposito5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Lagnese / Susan Stasiak vs Lynne Cosler / Nancy Whitacre6-1, 6-2
2025-01-13vs LBK Club SerlingWon 30
W#1 DoublesPrentiss McNeill / Lucy Wong vs Bethany Buck / Beth Shribman6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Huelster / Nancy Lagnese vs Jill Serling / Gail Finn6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Curtin / Susan Stasiak vs Judy Mitchell / Sue Randall2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Prentiss McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Pamela Huelster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
2.53
Ann Hollins
published 3
2.47
Sony Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lucy Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Lagnese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Cloud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheryl King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Green
published
Susan Stasiak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Stasiak + Nancy Lagnese213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Prentiss McNeill
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.23
Pamela Huelster
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Christine del Monte
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Ann Hollins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Sony Martinez
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Lucy Wong
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Curtin
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Lagnese
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Cloud
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheryl King
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Green
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Stasiak
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.