Teams

FLYHS JONES

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-24vs CCOC HOCATEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Fradette / Albert Wu vs Robert Keller / Eric Ringer6-4, 6-2
2023-05-17vs CSRC WHITELost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Fradette / Albert Wu vs Zachary Carpenter / Austin Carpenter4-6, 5-7
2023-04-19vs CSRC WHITELost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Kirkland / Albert Wu vs Jon Dickey / Frank Johnson4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Greg Raymond
published 4
3.86
James Fradette
published 4
3.83
Eric Howard
published 4
3.80
Blake Barcus
published 4
3.79
David Kirkland
published 4
3.73
Bill Hurst
published 4
3.72
Albert Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Matt Campbell
published
3.34
Steve Jones
published
3.32
Mark Schmucker
published
Ian Harden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Jones + Blake Barcus8456% games+3.0% vs expected
Eric Howard + Greg Raymond9456% games+2.1% vs expected
James Fradette + Bill Hurst5255% games+1.0% vs expected
Mark Schmucker + Steve Jones123 matchesnot enough data
James Fradette + Eric Howard213 matchesnot enough data
Steve Jones + Eric Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Steve Jones + Greg Raymond123 matchesnot enough data
Eric Howard + Bill Hurst303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Greg Raymond
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
James Fradette
32W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Eric Howard
34W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Blake Barcus
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
David Kirkland
30W–37L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Bill Hurst
20W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4.5
Albert Wu
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
Matt Campbell
60W–34L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Steve Jones
37W–23L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.34
Mark Schmucker
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Ian Harden
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.