Teams

PV:Cuqua 4.0 men

2021 ECT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2020-11-14vs LS:18& over 4.0 Men:KirwanLost 13
L#1 DoublesTerence McAndrew / Barry Manfredi vs Dennis Aspesi / Aaron Casey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Cuqua vs Rahul Chandrasekaran6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGreg Ferraro / Huntington Welch vs Lee Howard / Matthew Goldreich2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlex Dulski / Thomas Kearney vs Joe Binks / Steven Wells6-7, 4-6
2020-10-11vs MIS:Strickler 4.0 MenLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarry Manfredi / Terence McAndrew vs Andy Strickler / Robert Gay7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Cuqua / Thomas Kearney vs Kenneth Kienlen / Nicanor Lucas2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGreg Ferraro / George Moore vs Rob Carron / Glen Herbert3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PV:Cuqua 4.0 men000000
2MIS:Strickler 4.0 Men0615920177
3LS:18& over 4.0 Men:Kirwan06121228194
4GF:Drives United:White06121229230
5MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski0681635233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Barry Manfredi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Greg Ferraro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Huntington Welch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Michael Cuqua
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Terence McAndrew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Ferraro + Barry Manfredi7067% games+5.7% vs expected
Greg Ferraro + Huntington Welch3343% gamesnot enough data
Michael Cuqua + Thomas Kearney224 matchesnot enough data
Greg Ferraro + Thomas Kearney123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Cuqua + Terence McAndrew213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barry Manfredi
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Greg Ferraro
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Huntington Welch
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Michael Cuqua
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Terence McAndrew
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Kearney
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.