Teams

Brown

2024 Adult 40 & Over · Women 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.62 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-23vs LambsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Dielschneider / Nancy Brown vs Erin LeClerc / Carolyn Vlaich7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-16vs LambsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Dielschneider / Michele Bredow vs Erin LeClerc / ROSELYN REYES-TEACH6-4, 6-3
2024-07-09vs LambsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Allgeyer / Karen McDoniel vs Erin LeClerc / Carolyn Vlaich7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Dielschneider / Michele Bredow vs Cara Artman / Tracy Duggins6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-18vs LambsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlisa Kelley / Christine Mcgauley vs Pamela Chatman / Lizbeth Rowe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnne Dielschneider vs Cara Artman2-6, 4-6
2024-06-11vs LambsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren McDoniel / Amy Allgeyer vs Pamela Chatman / Lizbeth Rowe6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichele Bredow vs ROSELYN REYES-TEACH6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlisa Kelley / Christine Mcgauley vs Karen Siegel / Carolyn Vlaich6-1, 6-0
2024-06-04vs LambsWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren McDoniel / Amy Allgeyer vs Cara Artman / Tracy Duggins6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnne Dielschneider vs ROSELYN REYES-TEACH6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Mcgauley / Alisa Kelley vs Erin LeClerc / Jean Nero6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Christine Mcgauley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Michele Bredow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.42
Karen McDoniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Alisa Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Anne Dielschneider
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.23
Amy Allgeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alisa Kelley + Christine Mcgauley141252% games+6.2% vs expected
Amy Allgeyer + Karen McDoniel182549% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Mcgauley
27W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
Michele Bredow
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%70%30%
2.43
Karen McDoniel
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Alisa Kelley
25W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Anne Dielschneider
17W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Amy Allgeyer
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.