Teams

Billings - Dbls 3.5W

2022 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Summer Daze 3.5 Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-21vs Hughes - Dbls 3.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Vicki Amendum vs Patty Dutton / Robyn Manning7-6, 6-1
2022-07-07vs Yates - Dbls 3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelinda Billings / Emily Wilson vs Lucy Callahan / Dana Cossick6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-30vs Dulin - Dbls 3.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelinda Billings / Emily Wilson vs Michele Shigo / Lorri Stephenson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs Hughes - Dbls 3.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Reeves Rhoten vs Robyn Manning / Margaret Joseph5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Daze 3.5 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Layne Saunders
published
3.82
Rachel Kohler
published
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.29
Cameron Wannamaker
published 3.5
3.25
Rosa Phillips
published
3.17
Claire Driscoll
published 3.5
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Mary Winstead
published
3.04
Amy Geer
published 3.5
2.85
Annetta Bartle
published 3
2.78
Gail Terrell
published 3
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
153W–75L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Rachel Kohler
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cameron Wannamaker
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Rosa Phillips
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Mary Winstead
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Geer
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.