Teams

MWalters (Carmel)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs TEby (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hayward vs Jennifer Danesis6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Anne Schmitt6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMeghan Walters / Kristin Thompson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hayward vs Monica Guerra6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErrin Jensen / Kara Olsen vs Paulina Coello / Jami Stone6-1, 6-3
2023-04-17vs VWade (Springfield)Won 20
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hayward vs Kara Ward6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Patti Bachner6-1, 6-1
2023-04-05vs TBlankenship (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrittany Newcomb / Errin Jensen vs Cassandra Greco / Kim Garner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hayward vs Sumi Gerry6-0, 6-1
2023-04-03vs MRawlings (Firethorne)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRobyn Hayward / Murielle Hage vs Jennifer Pollino / Dorie de Armas6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesErrin Jensen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMeghan Walters / Kara Olsen vs Kim King / Laura Carpinelli2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-13vs SBeard (Charlotte Country Club)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRobyn Hayward / Stephanie Parker vs Laura Judd / Tracey Cook6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Stacy Beard6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMeghan Walters / Jennifer Byer vs Kerry Baldwin / Mary Catherine Chesney3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-03-06vs TEby (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesErrin Jensen vs Katie Monson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Kaiser / Meghan Walters vs Casey Beck / Stacey Young0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesErrin Jensen / Kristin Thompson vs Gianna Elden / Shanin Trivanovic6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRobyn Hayward vs Helen Wood6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Robyn Hayward
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.48
Catherine Bauer
published 3.5
3.20
Errin Jensen
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Kelly Kaiser
published
2.93
Meghan Walters
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Kara Olsen
published
2.48
Quinn Goff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Walters + Robyn Hayward5070% games+19.3% vs expected
Robyn Hayward + Errin Jensen6258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robyn Hayward
51W–12L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Catherine Bauer
18W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Errin Jensen
39W–19L career · 8 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Kaiser
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Meghan Walters
44W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
Kara Olsen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.88
Quinn Goff
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%54%46%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.