Teams

Van Dyke Farms - M. Heston

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMARY HESTON / Lindsay Williams vs Tricia Cardoso / Carrie Bradley6-2, 6-0
2023-05-08vs AvilaWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Corn / Stephanie van Brocklin vs Anne Stafford / Joy Themides6-4, 6-2
2023-05-01vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesMARY HESTON / Pamela Moore vs Anne Marie Lennox / Jennifer Duglin3-6, 2-6
2023-04-24vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterWon 10
W#1 SinglesStephanie van Brocklin vs AMY ISAAC6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesStephanie van Brocklin / MARY HESTON vs Jenni Carroll / Julie Sayer6-4, 7-6
2023-04-03vs Carrollwood 40 Love - L. GregoryLost 01
L#1 DoublesMARY HESTON / Stephanie van Brocklin vs Lacy Gregory / Johnessa Hern4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
MARY HESTON
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Stephanie van Brocklin
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Kathleen Roberts
published
3.00
Audrey Kessler
published 3
2.81
Michelle Barry
published
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
2.79
Wendy Corn
published
2.79
Pamela Moore
published
2.56
Barbara Castro
published 3
2.55
Karen Sanford
published
2.53
Cherie Adkins
published 3
2.40
Bridget Harrison
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie van Brocklin + MARY HESTON301559% games+1.0% vs expected
Pamela Moore + Karen Sanford213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Barry + Wendy Corn213 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Kessler + Stephanie van Brocklin213 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Kessler + Kathleen Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
MARY HESTON
124W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Stephanie van Brocklin
155W–79L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kathleen Roberts
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Audrey Kessler
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Michelle Barry
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Wendy Corn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Pamela Moore
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Barbara Castro
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Karen Sanford
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Cherie Adkins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Bridget Harrison
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%77%23%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.