Teams

LATA18/Rohwedder/LCTC

2025 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 2.5 - Night

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-30vs LATA18/PATE/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Brown / Keiona Middleton vs Rebecca Walker / Jennifer Winchester3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Rohwedder vs Leslie Leonard1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Switzer / Maria McGee vs Heather Pate / Gina Cox0-6, 1-6
2025-03-20vs LATA18/Prioleau/TSWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaria McGee / Emily Harmon vs Janice Prioleau / Tina Houser6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Switzer / Laurie Phipps vs Jessica Loudermilk / Debra Horlback6-1, 6-0
2025-03-06vs LATA18/PATE/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Phipps / Ellen Duncan vs Jody Britt / Gina Cox2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Rojas vs Heather Pate1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Harmon / Keiona Middleton vs Rebecca Walker / Leslie Leonard1-6, 0-6
2025-01-30vs LATA18/Prioleau/TSWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Phipps / Susan Brown vs Debra Horlback / Kendra Neely7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Duncan / Laura Switzer vs Tina Houser / Janice Prioleau6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 2.5 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Christine Bowman
published 2.5
2.46
Laura Switzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Laurie Phipps
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Emily Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Ashley Rojas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Holly Rohwedder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ellen Duncan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Keiona Middleton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Bowman + Laura Switzer3257% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Phipps + Laura Switzer303 matchesnot enough data
Emily Harmon + Ashley Rojas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Christine Bowman
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.57
Laura Switzer
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Laurie Phipps
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Emily Harmon
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Ashley Rojas
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Holly Rohwedder
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.08
Ellen Duncan
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keiona Middleton
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.