Teams

DI - Distinguished Deuces - T. Maulchin

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-07vs West Meadows - C. KarkourWon 10
W#2 DoublesAbhik Roy / David Voelker vs Damien Munnings / Anthony Olvey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-17vs Just Buckhorn It - J. TorresSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAbhik Roy / Andrew Sheets vs Hansil Kalaria / John Orr4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Schultz vs Daniel Bulso6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTimothy Mualchin / Scott Clementi vs Brian Stone / James Schneider2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGoran Alimpic / Mi Miller vs Sebastian Graba / Ben DeBrocke3-6, 4-6
2025-05-10vs Vamos HCC - J. OrsiniLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Voelker / Goran Alimpic vs Carlos Layrisse / David Palmer1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-03vs West Meadows - C. KarkourWon 30
W#1 DoublesTobias Carling / Scott Clementi vs Charbel Karkour / Dan Crawford6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAbhik Roy / Andrew Sheets vs Alex Tosetto / Emilio Silva6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJean-Claude Robert / John Schultz vs Lawrence Popescu / Walter Carpenter7-5, 6-0
2025-04-26vs RH - K. ThompkinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Sheets / David Voelker vs Gregory Betza / Nick Crim6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Andrew Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Abhik Roy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Goran Alimpic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Scott Clementi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Jean-Claude Robert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
David Voelker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Tobias Carling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
3.32
Timothy Mualchin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Schultz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abhik Roy + Andrew Sheets16261% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Sheets
33W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Abhik Roy
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Goran Alimpic
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Scott Clementi
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Jean-Claude Robert
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Tobias Carling
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Timothy Mualchin
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
John Schultz
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.