Teams

Conatser-April Sound

2026 NOHO MIXED 55 & Over · 7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-03vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-WoodlandsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Mathis / Carrie Mathis vs Moiz Husain / Maria Donovan6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Callihan / Yvonne Callihan vs Oscar Mejia / Carol Buonfiglio2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWade Leake / Michelle Robertson vs Brian Mourino / Karen Seefeldt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-WoodlandsWon 21
W#1 DoublesWade Leake / Michelle Robertson vs Kevin Whitenight / Catriona Edmond6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Callihan / Yvonne Callihan vs Timothy Pierce / Kristen Perkins6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Mathis / Carrie Mathis vs Kevin McGuirk / Lori VanJoslin0-6, 5-7
2026-04-25vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-WoodlandsLost 03
L#1 DoublesWade Leake / Jamie Speake vs Kevin Whitenight / Kristen Perkins6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLayne Smith / Tammy Conatser vs Kevin McGuirk / Catriona Edmond4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Callihan / Yvonne Callihan vs Timothy Pierce / Carol Buonfiglio5-7, 3-6
2026-04-19vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-WoodlandsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJohn Callihan / Yvonne Callihan vs Brian Mourino / Karen Seefeldt6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesArnold Jimenez / Tammy Conatser vs Moiz Husain / Maria Donovan1-6, 2-6
2026-03-29vs Pierce-Hard Knocks-WoodlandsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Callihan / Yvonne Callihan vs Kevin McGuirk / Catriona Edmond2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWade Leake / Michelle Robertson vs Brian Mourino / Karen Seefeldt6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLayne Smith / Jamie Speake vs Carol Buonfiglio / Timothy Pierce4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Jamie Speake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Carrie Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Steve Mathis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Conatser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wade Leake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Yvonne Callihan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Mathis + Steve Mathis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jamie Speake
6W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Carrie Mathis
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Steve Mathis
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tammy Conatser
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wade Leake
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Callihan
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.