Teams

A18 3.0M CRC Shand

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men Summer

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-16vs A18 3.0M MV1 KanetskyWon 32
W#1 DoublesFaisal Qadir / David Harvan vs DANIEL CONNOR / Michael Sidoti6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDon Shoemaker vs Ryan White3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKonstantin Guiler / Alexander Miron vs Jason MacKo / Jino Park0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTommy Visconsi vs Abhinav Acharya6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteven Curtin / Joseph Findley vs Alexander Khaykin / Mike Kanetsky7-6, 6-4
2024-07-09vs A18 3.0M WE HulewatSplit 22
L#1 DoublesFaisal Qadir / Michael Potter-Schneider vs Michael Henry / Michael Deyo2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDon Shoemaker vs Thomas Shaw6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs Kiyotaka Fukamachi / Dino Rizza6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPeter Vinocur / Alexander Miron vs Andrew Burnight / Mark Chiacchiari6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-02vs A18 3.0M MV2 KingSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Potter-Schneider / Paul Shand vs RJ King / Phil King0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTommy Visconsi vs Christian King6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Jeremy Kirkpatrick vs JT King / Jim King2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Curtin / Konstantin Guiler vs Karl King / John J King6-7, 5-7
2024-06-25vs A18 3.0M CV ParkerWon 40
W#1 SinglesFaisal Qadir vs Brandon Johannes6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / David Garten vs Christian Manchester / Zhigang Gao6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJantzen Roth vs Mark Seifried6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlexander Miron / Konstantin Guiler vs Mike Carroll / Paul Fantauzzo6-2, 6-4
2024-06-18vs A18 3.0M CSC MacLeanLost 23
L#1 DoublesCorey Roth / Tommy Visconsi vs Dylan MacLean / Nicholas Wille6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDon Shoemaker vs Di Fan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Harvan / Faisal Qadir vs Jacob Glenn / Wayne Barry6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJantzen Roth vs Sanjay Singh6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Curtin / Joseph Findley vs Dennis Giancola / Christopher Sippel3-6, 4-6
2024-06-11vs A18 3.0M MV1 KanetskyLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaul Shand / David Garten vs Jeeho Chang / Jino Park3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJantzen Roth vs Ryan White1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Visconsi / Miles Molyneaux vs Scott Limestoll / Michael Sidoti6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCorey Roth / Gabriel Rhoads vs Mike McManemy / Mike Kanetsky7-5, 6-3
2024-06-04vs A18 3.0M WE HulewatLost 13
L#1 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs Thomas Shaw / Michael Deyo3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDon Shoemaker vs Doug Constantine5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Saltzman / Charles Napoli vs Jonathan Mester / Michael Henry6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKonstantin Guiler / Steven Curtin vs Brandon Hopkins / Dino Rizza6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-28vs A18 3.0M MV2 KingSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Levy / Tommy Visconsi vs Jim King / Karl King3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesFaisal Qadir vs Christian King6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Garten / Miles Molyneaux vs Phil King / Rick King3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJantzen Roth vs Matt Burnett6-1, 6-2
2024-05-21vs A18 3.0M CV ParkerLost 13
L#1 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs Steve Poe / Carl Parker3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlexander Miron / Michael Potter-Schneider vs Tim Hofer / Mike Carroll6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSteven Curtin vs Lance Fry2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGabriel Rhoads / Peter Vinocur vs Chris Janson / Paul Fantauzzo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-14vs A18 3.0M CSC MacLeanWon 40
W#1 DoublesPaul Shand / Tommy Visconsi vs Michael Goldberg / Nicholas Wille6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDon Shoemaker vs Bohuai Zhang6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJantzen Roth / Jeremy Kirkpatrick vs Christopher Sippel / Di Fan7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCharles Napoli / David Harvan vs Wayne Barry / Lloyd Bell6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A18 3.0M Ashdown80301030340
2OH NEO A18 3.0M Bissell71301026285
3A18 3.0M CSC MacLean73272357450
4OH NEO A18 3.0M Ciborek62271330283
5A18 3.0M FRR Campbell62231741341
6A18 3.0M MV2 King64311943418
7A18 3.0M WE Hulewat64242663477
8A18 3.0M NC1 Emley53241636328
9A18 3.0M SP Benson53231739317
10A18 3.0M NC2 Kabbara53231739342
11A18 3.0M CRC Shand55252556462
12A18 3.0M CV Parker46203066500
13A18 3.0M MM2 Lombardo35192149358
14A18 3.0M GR Dale35172350372
15A18 3.0M LT2 Wood26162454401
16A18 3.0M MV1 Kanetsky28232758460
17A18 3.0M BV Hendershot0883267425
18A18 3.0M FA Fortney0863472461

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Tommy Visconsi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.85
Jantzen Roth
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Faisal Qadir
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Charles Napoli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Daniel Bergrin
published 3
2.69
Alexander Miron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Corey Roth
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.58
Paul Shand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Steven Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
David Garten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Don Shoemaker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jeff Gardner
published
Konstantin Guiler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Miles Molyneaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Vinocur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corey Roth + Jantzen Roth9655% games+8.5% vs expected
Corey Roth + Paul Shand033 matchesnot enough data
Corey Roth + Miles Molyneaux033 matchesnot enough data
Paul Shand + Alexander Miron213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tommy Visconsi
4W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
Jantzen Roth
23W–12L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Faisal Qadir
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Charles Napoli
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Daniel Bergrin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Alexander Miron
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Corey Roth
26W–55L career · 7 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
Paul Shand
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
Steven Curtin
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.48
2.5
David Garten
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Don Shoemaker
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Gardner
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Konstantin Guiler
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Miles Molyneaux
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Vinocur
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.