Teams

SunPro Advantage

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.29 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors000000
2Sports Mall-Finlay000000
3Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet000000
4Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano000000
5SLTHC-Bayna000000
6Cottonwood-Haverkost/Nielsen000000
7SLTHC-Haroldsen/Leatham000000
8Liberty Park-Prince-Hagood/Kesler000000
9Trentman000000
10SunPro Advantage000000
11Spencer000000
12Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Farr000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Alivia Winkel
published 3.5
3.34
Rachel Gouff
published 3.5
3.20
Cheryl Harker
published 3.5
3.19
Liz Rowley
published 3.5
3.08
Stephanie Webb
published
3.02
Cherylin Winkel
published 3.5
3.02
Jill McEwen
published 3.5
2.98
Krista Stewart
published
2.97
Sherston Faux
published 3.5
2.89
Cari Cardall
published 3
2.82
Rachelle Lee
published 3
2.81
Chrissy Oliveros
published 3
2.75
Melissa Reoch
published 3
2.73
Christine Gouff
published 3
Kim Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Gouff + Christine Gouff71152% games+4.1% vs expected
Rachelle Lee + Stephanie Webb4356% games+2.4% vs expected
Rachelle Lee + Christine Gouff10748% games+1.4% vs expected
Chrissy Oliveros + Cari Cardall4744% games−1.6% vs expected
Sherston Faux + Cherylin Winkel0835% games−2.3% vs expected
Melissa Reoch + Cherylin Winkel2347% games−4.0% vs expected
Sherston Faux + Krista Stewart2544% games−10.5% vs expected
Sherston Faux + Liz Rowley044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alivia Winkel
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Rachel Gouff
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Cheryl Harker
164W–136L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Liz Rowley
98W–66L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Stephanie Webb
48W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Cherylin Winkel
112W–142L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Jill McEwen
43W–55L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Krista Stewart
27W–58L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Sherston Faux
88W–157L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Cari Cardall
64W–90L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Rachelle Lee
52W–48L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chrissy Oliveros
77W–89L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Melissa Reoch
90W–77L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Christine Gouff
54W–82L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kim Ward
11W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.