Teams

Goodart/JB/3Oaks

2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring league 2.5-4.0 · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-08vs Evins/JB/RPCCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJimmy Gaither / Ericson Bacsa vs Richard Milton / Jacob Cunningham3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNapoleon Davis vs Chris Evins6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChase Myers / Don Threm vs Brad Popejoy / Brian Dickson4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMichael McEuen / Mark Jumper vs Brandon Gates / Randy Shinabery6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-03vs Evins/JB/RPCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesNapoleon Davis vs Brandon Gates6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJason Davis / Michael McEuen vs Brad Popejoy / Richard Milton6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEricson Bacsa / Jimmy Gaither vs Mike Fletcher / Nick Guinn5-7, 4-6
2025-04-01vs Evins/JB/RPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Mitchener / Ericson Bacsa vs John Hill / Nick Guinn2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Jumper / Don Threm vs Richard Daniel / Jacob Cunningham1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesMichael McEuen / Grant Goodart vs Brandon Gates / Brian Dickson1-6, 3-6
2025-03-12vs Evins/JB/RPCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEricson Bacsa / Mark Jumper vs Brad Popejoy / Robby Patterson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael McEuen / Don Threm vs Brian Dickson / Mike Fletcher6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Michael McEuen
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Mark Jumper
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Chase Myers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Grant Goodart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Matthew Mitchener
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Jimmy Gaither
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Don Threm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ericson Bacsa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Napoleon Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Mitchener + Chase Myers3258% games+14.6% vs expected
Ericson Bacsa + Matthew Mitchener123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael McEuen
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Mark Jumper
15W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Chase Myers
19W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Grant Goodart
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Matthew Mitchener
13W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Jimmy Gaither
0W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
Don Threm
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ericson Bacsa
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Napoleon Davis
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.