← Teams

MAC-Bonnell

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Diana Almy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Stacy Hawkins Parker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
—
Kim Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Nancy Williams
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Alison Davis vs Jana Hirst / Tami Oglesby6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Heidi Wilcox vs Suzanne Boss / Suzanne Hidde7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine Go / Kim Stevens vs Cathy Epperson / Sandy Swift6-2, 6-1
2018-11-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Andrea Bowen vs Fumiyo Bookstein / Kim Montagriff6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKate Slott / Alison Davis vs Suzanne Boss / Joanne Maginnis6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Reidun Zander vs Mary McCarter / Lora Wahl6-3, 6-3
2018-10-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Diana Almy vs Rochelle Hart / Colleen Hamilton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Dilorenzo / Nancy Williams vs Janet Huston / Andrea Peltosalo6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Zilbert / Heidi Wilcox vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-10-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDiana Almy / Catherine Go vs Boon Yon Joung / Suk Ki Lee5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Stevens / Linda Lovett vs Julie Hansen / Regan Reichle7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Alison Davis vs Andrea Vicino / Carla Wheeler6-1, 6-1
2018-09-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Nancy Williams vs Penny Birkhofer / Sandra Seyler1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Catherine Go vs Amiee Moyers / Nenette Olson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Hunt / Linda Lovett vs Katherine Kralj / Donna Roisom7-6, 6-3
2018-09-22Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDiana Almy / Andrea Bowen vs Kathleen Goodfriend / Kate Hunter6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Dana Hunt vs Lisa Lyon / Deirdre Harms4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-09-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDiana Almy / Catherine Go vs Lisa Provost / Kelly Asbridge6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Williams / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Nancy Ansboury / Blanche Sabo7-6, 7-6
2018-09-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesShannon Dilorenzo / Nancy Williams vs Boon Yon Joung / Regan Reichle7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Almy / Andrea Bowen vs Andrea Vicino / Angie Lee6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Bonnell / Alison Davis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Diana Almy
50W–38L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Stacy Hawkins Parker
58W–55L career
8%92%0%
4.06
4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Nancy Williams
59W–52L career
59%41%0%
2.91

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.