Teams

Faulconer Saul- Farmington

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs BHSC- RyanLost 02
L#1 SinglesCaroline Faulconer Saul vs Taylor Kelley1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKatherine Jane Powell vs Christina Nicholaou4-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs Furlow - Forest LakesWon 10
W#3 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Maggie Leary6-0, 7-5
2025-10-01vs Fletcher - Sets on the BeachLost 12
W#1 SinglesKendall Southmayd vs Lori Gagnon7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCaroline Faulconer Saul vs Maggie Nguyen6-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesAnne Barger vs Mary Primm3-6, 2-6
2025-09-24vs BHSC- RyanLost 12
L#1 SinglesCaroline Faulconer Saul vs Allie Bryan1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKendall Southmayd vs Maggie Mudd6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAshleigh Pivonka vs Taylor Kelley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-17vs Furlow - Forest LakesWon 20
W#1 SinglesPenny Ward vs Linda Corradino6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnne Barger vs Maggie Leary3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs Fletcher - Sets on the BeachLost 01
L#3 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Susie Abramson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Penny Ward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Anne Barger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kendall Southmayd
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Katherine Jane Powell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Ashleigh Pivonka
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Caroline Faulconer Saul
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.93
Loring Woodriff
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Jill Lord
published
2.73
Ann Hay Hardy
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Meaghan Brody
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hay Hardy + Loring Woodriff8654% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Ward
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Anne Barger
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kendall Southmayd
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Katherine Jane Powell
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Ashleigh Pivonka
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Caroline Faulconer Saul
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Loring Woodriff
71W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jill Lord
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Hay Hardy
64W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Meaghan Brody
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.