Teams

EW-PC-Hebdon

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-23vs YTC - Straight Outta YakimaWon 50
W#1 DoublesDanielle Dunigan / Shaelah Harmon vs Lisa Watkins / Kayla Robins7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Hebdon vs Megan Jacobson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Duncan / Mauri Morgan vs Jill Christianson / Kristen Kegley6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJaelynne King vs Molly Neal6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Neuberger / Cheyenne Morrison vs Beata Miller / Sarah Michael6-1, 6-2
2025-02-22vs PC - The Sister SquadWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Duncan / Anne Neuberger vs Rebecca Hiles / Karin Kontogianis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmber Pentecost / Jaelynne King vs Heather Weber / Kari Denson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanielle Dunigan / Rikki West vs Jolene Szendre / Doreen Miller6-3, 7-6
2025-02-22vs CBRC - CurryWon 50
W#1 DoublesTanaya Bruneel / Shaelah Harmon vs Judy Doherty / Kathy Queen6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Hebdon vs Huijuan Zhang6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJaelynne King / Amber Pentecost vs Dragana Vrcelj-Nikolic / Lory Allen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCheyenne Morrison vs Soma Ghosh1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMauri Morgan / Rikki West vs Deniz Inci Demirkanli / Heidi Bucheli6-2, 6-0
2025-02-21vs HRAC - ClassicsWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmber Pentecost / Danielle Dunigan vs Bonnie LeBreton-Smith / Eva Hume6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Hebdon vs Amy Leclerc7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeestan Willes / Anne Neuberger vs Stephanie Mehrhof / Courtney Jackson6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJaelynne King vs Eleanor Robertson - (DQ)*3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRikki West / Tanaya Bruneel vs Beatriz Acosta / Colleen Carroll Sabo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDanielle Dunigan / Tanaya Bruneel vs Rose Longoria / Erika Mullins6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCheyenne Morrison vs Jessica Rottweiler3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Hebdon / Tina Duncan vs Bri Plath / Amy Helms6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAmber Pentecost vs Jennifer Terami6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShaelah Harmon / Mauri Morgan vs Andrea Jedel / Amy Karau6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Shaelah Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Mauri Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Keestan Willes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Tina Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Rikki West
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Anne Neuberger
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Danielle Dunigan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Jaelynne King
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Tiffany Hebdon
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amber Pentecost
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Cheyenne Morrison
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Riley Hebdon
published
Tanaya Bruneel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rikki West + Shaelah Harmon10168% games+15.8% vs expected
Anne Neuberger + Tina Duncan6267% games+10.3% vs expected
Mauri Morgan + Shaelah Harmon10359% games+8.2% vs expected
Mauri Morgan + Tina Duncan11262% games+6.9% vs expected
Danielle Dunigan + Amber Pentecost2352% games+2.1% vs expected
Rikki West + Danielle Dunigan5652% games+0.4% vs expected
Danielle Dunigan + Shaelah Harmon404 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Hebdon + Tina Duncan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shaelah Harmon
38W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Mauri Morgan
39W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Keestan Willes
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Tina Duncan
48W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Rikki West
45W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Anne Neuberger
55W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Danielle Dunigan
59W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Jaelynne King
15W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Tiffany Hebdon
20W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amber Pentecost
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheyenne Morrison
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Riley Hebdon
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanaya Bruneel
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.