Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 65AW8.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barb Pridham
published 4
3.59
Diane Hudson
published 4
3.33
Elaine Roe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
May Mu
published
3.33
Christine Fronczak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Carolyn Booker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Bette Cruikshank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Barbara Westergren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lale Doluca
published
Stacey Escobar
published
Terri E Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Yumiko Glasspool
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Booker + Bette Cruikshank4355% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Booker + Elaine Roe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barb Pridham
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Diane Hudson
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Elaine Roe
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
May Mu
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Carolyn Booker
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Bette Cruikshank
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Westergren
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Lale Doluca
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Escobar
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri E Morrison
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yumiko Glasspool
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.