Teams

Kr.Patch18S

2023 Cap Fall Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-09-27vs Di.King18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Kristin Upchurch6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Stephanie Bradley4-6, 3-6
2023-09-20vs Di.King18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Stephanie Bradley6-1, 6-1
2023-09-13vs Di.King18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Kelly Baltzer6-0, 6-1
2023-09-06vs Di.King18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Kristin Upchurch6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKristen Patch vs Diane Bosnjak King6-2, 6-3
2023-08-30vs Di.King18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKristen Patch vs Diane Bosnjak King6-1, 6-2
2023-08-23vs Di.King18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Wendy Teeter6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Kelly Baltzer6-0, 6-0
2023-08-16vs Di.King18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristen Patch vs Wendy Teeter2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Kristin Upchurch6-0, 7-5
2023-08-09vs Di.King18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Stephanie Bradley6-0, 7-5
2023-08-02vs Di.King18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesKristen Patch vs Diane Bosnjak King6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Kelly Baltzer6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ferebee Plyler
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Betsy Carr
published 3.5
3.00
Sarah Newton
published
2.99
Ihrie Wood
published
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.58
Sheri Erhart
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.18
Sarah Sims Chesson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+6.7% vs expected
Sheri Erhart + Kristen Patch2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ferebee Plyler
87W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Betsy Carr
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Sarah Newton
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Ihrie Wood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Sheri Erhart
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Sarah Sims Chesson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.