Teams

RBredder (Carmel)

2022 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men - Wed PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-28vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBill Clementi / Tom Shober vs Wayne Ernest / Robert Cazares3-6, 0-6
2022-09-21vs MFarley/BPaley (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Wegerek / Tom Shober vs Daniel Barbu / Kevin Miller1-6, 0-6
2022-09-07vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Comisar / Thomas Kraus vs Wayne Ernest / Mike Boston4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-31vs MFarley/BPaley (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Comisar / Peter Estelle vs Gordon Lowman / Ralph Martinez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-17vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Comisar / Thomas Kraus vs Steve Brinkman / John England7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Daniel Comisar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Dean Lackey
published 4
3.80
Eduardo Brea
published 4
3.75
Thomas Kraus
published
3.50
Tom Shober
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
David Grindstaff
published 4
Roger Bredder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Kraus + Daniel Comisar5454% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Comisar
90W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4
Dean Lackey
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Eduardo Brea
6W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Thomas Kraus
16W–20L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Tom Shober
63W–38L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
David Grindstaff
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Roger Bredder
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.