Teams

Doyle/18's/3.0/PAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Ann Boushie
usually #1 Doubles 49%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
3.05
Ana Perdigao
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3
3.03
Molly Burns
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.97
Laura Bonanno
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Amy St. Romain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Jessica Haley
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Joelle Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Rebecca Sandoz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Taylor Bouche
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Taylor Fortune
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Sandoz + Joelle Cuevas2346% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Sandoz + Amy St. Romain213 matchesnot enough data
Molly Burns + Ann Boushie303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Boushie
47W–18L career · 34 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Ana Perdigao
12W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Molly Burns
33W–13L career · 20 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
Laura Bonanno
21W–16L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Amy St. Romain
15W–11L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Haley
21W–3L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joelle Cuevas
26W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz
29W–18L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Bouche
21W–6L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Fortune
28W–10L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.