Teams

RGriffin-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-04vs KRamaswamy-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Fitts / Sam McCormick vs Jeremy Wheelwright / Ravi Verma4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStephen Fu vs Anjaneya Tiwari0-6, 0-6
2025-04-21vs JByrd2-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesSam McCormick / Greg Fitts vs David Belcher / Casey Collins6-3, 6-1
2025-04-05vs JMontague-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Ryan / Stephen Fu vs Anthony Womack / Zach Rowles4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-29vs TKharva-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Muller / Stephen Fu vs John Lin / Joe Park6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesGreg Fitts / Sam McCormick vs Morrie Schmidt / Daniel Allen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs JMontague-ENOSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephen Fu / Sam McCormick vs Conor O'Neill / Christopher Rogge1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Griffin / Greg Fitts vs Steve Haine / Rick Edmunds7-5, 6-3
2025-03-01vs ELanghans-ENOWon 32
W#1 DoublesRichard Griffin / Ethan Holston vs Andrew Burd / Colin Sauter6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDan Kane vs Saad Masood6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Muller / Austin Odling vs Andy Vanderford / Wes Cooper6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBen Stockdale vs Eric Langhans6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJonathan Ryan / Richard Millard vs Valentin Verdier / Josh Clinard6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jonathan Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Sam McCormick
published
3.31
Greg Fitts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Ethan Holston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ben Stockdale
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Dan Kane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Jeff Franklin
published
3.20
Austin Odling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Richard Millard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Stephen Fu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Ryan
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Sam McCormick
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Greg Fitts
29W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ethan Holston
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Ben Stockdale
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dan Kane
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Franklin
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.23
3.5
Austin Odling
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Richard Millard
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.