Teams

SGV Super Servers-Schiffman- WN/SA

2025 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Men 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-06vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SUWon 20
W#1 SinglesTed Randall vs TAREK BABA6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLarry Reed vs Afonso Miu3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-05vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10Split 11
W#1 SinglesShunkou Kinoshita vs Andy Zang6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Xiao Zhang3-6, 5-7
2025-03-22vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10Won 21
L#1 SinglesLarry Reed vs David Kong3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesChristopher Taus vs Andy Zang2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Xiao Zhang6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-16vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SUSplit 11
L#2 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Andy Baker1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesPaul Getto vs Gongqin Shen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShunkou Kinoshita vs Fred Kao2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Ian Kaufman2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTed Randall vs Tim Green4-6, 4-6
2025-02-22vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SULost 12
L#1 SinglesShunkou Kinoshita vs Kamron Shahriaree1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Nicholas Wang0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDan Schiffman vs Afonso Miu2-6, 2-6
2025-02-08vs SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10Lost 12
W#1 SinglesChristopher Taus vs Kirby Xu6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Chu vs Andy Zang2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Changlin Wu6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristopher Taus vs Fred Kao7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRiley Klarkowski vs Chase Block1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Riley Klarkowski
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
2.89
Larry Reed
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.88
Christopher Taus
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.80
Paul Getto
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Ted Randall
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.66
Shunkou Kinoshita
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.54
Dan Schiffman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.45
Michael Chu
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Juan Mireles
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Riley Klarkowski
25W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Larry Reed
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Christopher Taus
25W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Paul Getto
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Ted Randall
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Shunkou Kinoshita
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Dan Schiffman
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Michael Chu
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Juan Mireles
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.