Teams

GO Hollnagel

2025 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-15vs FK BlackertWon 21
W#1 DoublesChrissy Hollnagel / Victoria McClintock vs Angela Ba / Sarah Osian6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJenny Tompkins / Uyen Dao vs Jodi McClure / Jennifer Mendola2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Marquette / Eliza Gray vs Jane Ryals / Leslie Priest6-3, 6-3
2025-11-14vs Marion/DellovadeLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Scudder Thompson / Jennifer Russell vs Maria Oliver / Nina Stanton2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChrissy Hollnagel / Victoria McClintock vs Kayleen Quinn / Melody Licciardello1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLori Kovalenko / Jennifer Marquette vs Melissa Galloway / Jolinda Fisher4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kimberly Scudder Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Chrissy Hollnagel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Beth Eiland
published 3.5
3.03
Victoria McClintock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Uyen Dao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Eliza Gray
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Barbara Center
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jennifer Marquette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jenny Tompkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Hagan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Kovalenko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Scudder Thompson
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Chrissy Hollnagel
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Beth Eiland
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria McClintock
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Uyen Dao
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Eliza Gray
6W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Barbara Center
5W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Jennifer Marquette
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Tompkins
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Hagan
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Kovalenko
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.