Teams

Team 3 Causing a Racquet 2.5

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Icore / Roberta Zimmerman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-12vs Team 2 Deuces WildLost 01
L#2 DoublesNandita Kalyan / Rosy Mcgillan vs April Cullen / Nicole Connell5-7, 2-6
2025-03-09vs Team 1 Court QueensSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHeidi Davis / Sarah Icore vs Pooja Singh / Kelly Layton3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRosy Mcgillan / Roberta Zimmerman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-22vs Team 1 Court QueensWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosy Mcgillan / Nandita Kalyan vs Harini Nambiraghavan / Judy Pringle5-7, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Jocelyn McDaniel
published
2.46
Rosy Mcgillan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Amy Heuer
published 2.5
2.29
Sarah Icore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Nicola Allen
published
2.16
Nandita Kalyan
published
2.10
Heidi Davis
published
Roberta Zimmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosy Mcgillan + Sarah Icore2644% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Mcgillan + Lynnita Montague-Daddio2346% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Icore + Lynnita Montague-Daddio314 matchesnot enough data
Nicola Allen + Heidi Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
108W–128L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jocelyn McDaniel
47W–24L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Rosy Mcgillan
40W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Amy Heuer
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Sarah Icore
46W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Nicola Allen
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Nandita Kalyan
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Heidi Davis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Roberta Zimmerman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.