Teams

5-DStefan-HS

Tri-Level-18 & Over · 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Men Weekend

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-22vs 3-ROakley-EV-Tri-levelWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Paulo Vigolo vs Tevin Wilson / Jeffery Johnson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Dave Thomas vs Pat Ritchie / Greg Beckwith6-2, 6-3
2023-07-16vs 4-SMu-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Stefan / Valdis Stiebris vs Chunyang Fan / Qi Zhang6-2, 6-3
2023-07-01vs 1-NPuri/VGupta-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Mark Stone vs Sanjay Ambardar / Sid Thakur2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-17vs 3-ROakley-EV-Tri-levelWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Mark Stone vs Tevin Wilson / Joe Gonzalez6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-11vs 1-NPuri/VGupta-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Dave Thomas vs Vishal Gupta / Vijay Sharma0-6, 1-6
2023-06-03vs 4-SMu-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Perkinson / Eric Lindblom vs Siming Mu / Dipen Vyas4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Dave Thomas vs Chunyang Fan / Honglin Xiao2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Eric Lindblom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Michael Holt
published
3.35
Mike Kempel
published
3.10
Scott Hartman
published
3.10
Valdis Stiebris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
David Stefan
published 3.5
3.04
Mark Macdonald
published
2.95
Dave Thomas
published 3
2.61
Andy Jones
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Thomas + Andy Jones1541% games−1.5% vs expected
Dave Thomas + Scott Hartman123 matchesnot enough data
David Stefan + Scott Hartman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Lindblom
122W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Michael Holt
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Mike Kempel
39W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.35
Scott Hartman
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
David Stefan
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mark Macdonald
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Dave Thomas
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Andy Jones
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.