Teams

Aceholes

2026 OKCTri-Level 18 & Over · Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-12vs Mama Tri'dLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Kwiatkowski / Spencer Keeter vs Evan Piche / Tobie Timmermans2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJordan Tupper / Cayne Shaw vs Dickson Howell / Harrison Hightower4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Hanson / Sean Smith vs Neil Molina / John Walker6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-05vs Mama Tri'dLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Kwiatkowski / Spencer Keeter vs Evan Piche / Tobie Timmermans6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Tupper / Cayne Shaw vs Thomas Michaud / David Ogle3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRyan Hanson / Phillip Baker vs John Walker / Bart Ramsey6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-29vs Mama Tri'dLost 12
L#1 DoublesJack Hanson / Hunter DeMunbrun vs Ryan Weber / Tobie Timmermans2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJordan Tupper / Hunter Antonisse vs Jonathan Borsky / Harrison Hightower7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSean Smith / Phillip Baker vs John Walker / David Ogle7-5, 6-2
2026-07-22vs Mama Tri'dLost 02
L#1 DoublesJack Hanson / Hunter DeMunbrun vs Evan Piche / John Sedlak5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMark Partridge / Jordan Tupper vs Thomas Michaud / Jonathan Borsky4-6, 5-7
2026-07-15vs Mama Tri'dWon 21
W#1 DoublesSpencer Keeter / Mark Partridge vs Ryan Weber / Evan Piche2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHunter Antonisse / Jordan Tupper vs Dickson Howell / Jonathan Borsky2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSean Smith / Dar Patel vs Bart Ramsey / David Ogle6-2, 6-2
2026-07-08vs Mama Tri'dSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoe Kwiatkowski / Spencer Keeter vs John Sedlak / Evan Piche6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHunter Antonisse / Mark Partridge vs Dickson Howell / Thomas Michaud1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Spencer Keeter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Mark Partridge
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.04
Joe Kwiatkowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Cayne Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.94
Hunter Antonisse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Dar Patel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.88
Jordan Tupper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Ryan Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Phillip Baker
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Hunter DeMunbrun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dar Patel + Phillip Baker4161% games−1.3% vs expected
Jordan Tupper + Dar Patel2350% games−6.8% vs expected
Jordan Tupper + Cayne Shaw134 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Tupper + Hunter Antonisse044 matchesnot enough data
Hunter Antonisse + Mark Partridge134 matchesnot enough data
Joe Kwiatkowski + Spencer Keeter123 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Tupper + Mark Partridge033 matchesnot enough data
Cayne Shaw + Hunter Antonisse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Spencer Keeter
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.39
Mark Partridge
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
4.10
Joe Kwiatkowski
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4.5
Cayne Shaw
32W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Hunter Antonisse
15W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Dar Patel
102W–68L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
Jordan Tupper
48W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Ryan Hanson
69W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Phillip Baker
85W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.63
Hunter DeMunbrun
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jack Hanson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sean Smith
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.