Teams

Escambia/Marsach/18&Over7.5W

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-11vs Anderson - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Shannon Schluter vs Kristyn Miller / Michelle Telhiard6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Krohn vs Erin Rhone / Lauren Anderson2-6, 1-6
2024-12-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Melanie DiLoreto vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-20vs Anderson - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Cherie Krohn vs Sam Richardson / Erin Rhone2-6, 5-7
2024-11-09vs Andresen - PCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesIve Marsach / Maria Hicks vs Lisa Andresen / Amanda Brown6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jackson / Beata Antal vs Grace Allen / Natalie Mcelhany2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie DiLoreto / KIMBERLY ANDREWS vs Ansli Brown / Alycia Esmonde2-6, 3-6
2024-10-30vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Shannon Schluter vs Tracey Mcclurd / Van Hughes6-1, 7-6
2024-10-23vs Kreis - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Cherie Krohn vs Anna Kreis / Kelly Dempsey7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Beata Antal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Shannon Schluter
published
3.86
Ive Marsach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cherie Krohn
published 4
3.73
Sophie Rudman
published
3.63
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Melanie DiLoreto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Maria Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−5.5% vs expected
KIMBERLY ANDREWS + Ive Marsach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beata Antal
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Shannon Schluter
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Cherie Krohn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sophie Rudman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Melanie DiLoreto
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.