← Teams

SAC-Harwood

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Sydney Taggart
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.50
Eric Means
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Kana Wakamatsu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Chiharu Olsson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Shawn Boyce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.16
Shari Levelle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Joshua Tran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Diane di Vito
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Results8 ties
2021-11-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesChiharu Olsson / Eric Means vs Erika Finrow / Tochukwu George6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSydney Taggart / Saril Valiyaparambil vs Jana Hirst / Michael Yee6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShari Levelle / Shawn Boyce vs Robby Lafleur / Kevin Heller6-2, 7-5
2021-11-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesChiharu Olsson / Bryan Gonzalvo vs Erika Finrow / Eric Lee6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShari Levelle / Saril Valiyaparambil vs Natalie Nicholson / Sushil Srivastava6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSydney Taggart / Joshua Tran vs Jana Hirst / Michael Yee6-2, 6-4
2021-10-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKana Wakamatsu / Bryan Gonzalvo vs Truc Tran / Sammy Bui6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiane di Vito / Paul Harwood vs Kyle Cavelti / Kristin Taylor6-2, 6-1
2021-10-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMaureen Harwood / Shawn Boyce vs Flor Harrigan / Joseph Didner6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Eric Means vs Patrick Harkin / Vivian Nguyen3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBryan Gonzalvo / Diane di Vito vs Angie Lee / Neil Soiffer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesBryan Gonzalvo / Kana Wakamatsu vs William Creger / Ellen Mader6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Paul Harwood vs Sarah Ferrer / Kevin Jarvis6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSydney Taggart / Saril Valiyaparambil vs Paula Petrica / Shane Wilson6-1, 6-3
2021-10-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDiane di Vito / Joshua Tran vs Tony Moreno / Liz DelPlato6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEric Means / Julie Hansen vs Scott Eliason / Crystal Bryant6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSaril Valiyaparambil / Sydney Taggart vs Joseph Nguyen / Tami McAra6-4, 6-3
2021-10-03Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDao Her / Chiharu Olsson vs Megan Chow / Michael Kazangian6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBryan Gonzalvo / Kana Wakamatsu vs Rob Benedict / Lisa West6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Hansen / Eric Means vs Hanna Jensen / Joe Trachta3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDao Her / Chiharu Olsson vs D'Arcy Martin / Erin Hill6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShawn Boyce / Maureen Harwood vs Rudd McGarity / Jennie Brawn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Harwood / Sydney Taggart vs Liz DelPlato / Tony Moreno6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sydney Taggart
68W–105L career
24%75%1%
4.02
4
Eric Means
26W–48L career
36%64%0%
3.50
4
Kana Wakamatsu
60W–63L career
42%58%0%
3.47
3.5
Chiharu Olsson
48W–47L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Shawn Boyce
170W–125L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Shari Levelle
63W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.16
3.5
Paul Harwood
59W–69L career
14%85%1%
3.14
3.5
Joshua Tran
42W–57L career
20%80%0%
3.05
3
Diane di Vito
45W–53L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.