Teams

Le.Ji18M

2025 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-04vs Ra.Xu18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelsey Kowalski / Miles Feng vs Ryan Sheppard / Keshia Green4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-21vs Li.Arcos18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoshua Ganeles / Angela Teasdale vs Micah Widen / Hannon Thorn6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMiles Feng / Kelsey Kowalski vs Liz Arcos / Jeffrey Pollack6-0, 6-0
2025-07-14vs Sp.Johnson18MWon 10
W#2 DoublesLei Ji / Kelsey Kowalski vs McKinsey Blount / Zachary Dinkins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-04vs Ki.Durland18M4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJoshua Ganeles / Angela Teasdale vs Max Stevenson / Cameron Mize3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Baddour / Carey Baddour vs Carrie Vander Vennet / John Vander Vennet7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Ganeles / Ekaterina Seregina vs Wendy Jackson / See Boon Soo6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Kelsey Kowalski vs Meryl Golder / Daniel Breazeale5-7, 3-6
2025-06-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Carey Baddour vs Jason Liner / Alexis Johnson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Sk.Poole18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Teasdale / Joshua Ganeles vs Jonathan Adams / Ashlie Adams6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
3.98
Kelsey Kowalski
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.91
Megan Wu
published
3.83
Molly Andrews
published
3.82
David Baddour
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Joshua Ganeles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Carey Baddour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Miles Feng
published
3.69
Angela Teasdale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Terry Davidson
published
Lei Ji
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carey Baddour + David Baddour272051% games+1.2% vs expected
Joshua Ganeles + Angela Teasdale4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ekaterina Seregina
31W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Kelsey Kowalski
78W–64L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Megan Wu
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Molly Andrews
44W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
David Baddour
125W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Joshua Ganeles
66W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Carey Baddour
239W–204L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Miles Feng
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Angela Teasdale
43W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
Terry Davidson
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
Lei Ji
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.