Teams

8*KRamaswamy-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-25Won 20
W#2 SinglesAmit Sachan vs Sidharth Bansal6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-27vs 1*APineda-CHTCWon 20
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Donovan Khamphasong6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAjit Shankardas vs Gary Glish6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-20vs 5*TPetersen-HRWon 30
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Christopher Buccafusco6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs David Grose6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAjit Shankardas vs Tim McMahon6-2, 6-0
2024-06-13vs 4*PBream-UNCWon 10
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Barry Gooch6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-06vs 6*RHutchins-CHCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmit Sachan vs William Enright0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Robert Hutchins6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs Toland Barfield6-4, 6-3
2024-05-30vs 7*RGildehaus-YMCAWon 10
W#1 SinglesKiran Ramaswamy vs Stephen Rothchild6-1, 6-2
2024-05-23Lost 02
L#1 SinglesNitni Agrawal vs David Schumann5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAjit Shankardas vs Will Johnson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Karan Mehra
published
3.43
Amit Sachan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Nitni Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Ajit Shankardas
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amit Sachan + Kiran Ramaswamy15854% games+0.4% vs expected
Amit Sachan + Nitni Agrawal4250% games−2.7% vs expected
Nitni Agrawal + Kiran Ramaswamy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–127L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Karan Mehra
10W–31L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Amit Sachan
255W–240L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Nitni Agrawal
210W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Ajit Shankardas
36W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.