Teams

Tompkins 55+ 3.5

2026 Adult 55 & Over-EC · Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-11vs Webber MagnoliaWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerri Amacker / Kathy Beasley vs Catherine van Asselt / Kathryn Kenne1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Maria Bearden / Debbie Monroe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynn Gibson / Catherine Policicchio vs Jennifer Falkner / Renee Gibbons6-3, 6-1
2026-03-27vs Webber MagnoliaLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Renee Gibbons / Debbie Monroe6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Hodges / Robbin Jones vs Kathryn Kenne / Cyndi Sullivan0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Karen Turner vs Jennifer Falkner / Maria Bearden0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Webber MagnoliaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Beasley / Catherine Policicchio vs Vivian Cade / Cyndi Sullivan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Gibson / Laura Hodges vs Leslie Webber / Missy Brown6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Jennifer Falkner / Debbie Monroe6-2, 6-1
2026-03-12vs Webber MagnoliaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Vivian Cade / Kathryn Kenne4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerri Amacker / Catherine Policicchio vs Missy Brown / Ann Swedenburg2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Karen Turner vs Jennifer Falkner / Renee Gibbons2-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs Webber MagnoliaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Maria Bearden / Catherine van Asselt6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerri Amacker / Lynn Gibson vs Ann Swedenburg / Leslie Webber6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Webber Magnolia328717121
2Tompkins 55+ 3.5237817123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Julie Tompkins
published
3.25
Lynn Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Catherine Policicchio
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Maggie Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Kathy Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Terri Amacker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Turner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Moorehead
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robbin Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Amacker + Kathy Beasley2537% games−4.2% vs expected
Terri Amacker + Catherine Policicchio224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Tompkins
48W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lynn Gibson
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Catherine Policicchio
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Maggie Hamilton
52W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kathy Beasley
11W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Terri Amacker
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Karen Turner
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Moorehead
11W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robbin Jones
3W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.