Teams

MCL CANDELARIA

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-25vs WAL MIONEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDharmishtha Upadhyaya / Olivia Delaune vs Ana Lucas / Shannon Lee6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesShirley Vega vs Tina Pierce6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Howard / Julie Fox vs Cindy Gardner / Alice Stacey7-6, 6-1
2026-04-11vs RC MOOREWon 20
W#1 DoublesOlivia Delaune / Sierra Evans vs KC Holthaus / Anna Barr6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDharmishtha Upadhyaya vs Haley Snell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs WAL MIONELost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Howard / Julie Fox vs Ana Lucas / Shannon Lee4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesShirley Vega vs Tina Pierce6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOlivia Delaune / Paro Norris vs Barbie McAnalley / Alice Stacey3-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs RC MOORELost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Fox / Dharmishtha Upadhyaya vs Maggie Krenek / Margaret Harper7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesParo Norris vs Haley Snell3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSierra Evans / Stephanie Jones vs Anna Barr / KC Holthaus4-6, 4-6
2026-03-08vs WAL MIONEWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Jones / Olivia Delaune vs Cindy Gardner / Shannon Lee6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDharmishtha Upadhyaya vs Ana Lucas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSierra Evans / Megan Howard vs Barbie McAnalley / Jenny Sliheet2-6, 4-6
2026-02-28vs RC MOORELost 12
L#1 DoublesParo Norris / Sierra Evans vs Maggie Krenek / Haley Snell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesOlivia Delaune vs Jennifer Omana6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Jones / Megan Howard vs Anna Barr / Rachel Lang6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Saturday Ladies 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCL CANDELARIA3311717147
2RC MOORE3381024187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jomar Candelaria
published
2.49
Shirley Vega
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.40
Dharmishtha Upadhyaya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.38
Olivia Delaune
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.29
Julie Fox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Sierra Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.06
Megan Howard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.03
Paro Norris
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jomar Candelaria
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.90
Shirley Vega
10W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Dharmishtha Upadhyaya
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Olivia Delaune
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Julie Fox
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Sierra Evans
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Megan Howard
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Paro Norris
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.