Teams

6 Avalon Ghita

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed · Richmond Tri-Level Mixed 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

1 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/MID ATLANTIC / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Gabriela Ghita
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Results6 ties
2025-11-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Gabriela Ghita vs Lauren King / John Baker1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Gabriela Ghita vs Stephanie Yablonski / Jon Nystrom6-2, 6-1
2025-10-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Zima / Gabriela Ghita vs David Brown / Debbie Messmer6-4, 6-3
2025-10-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Gabriela Ghita vs Robert Calhoun / Samantha Mier6-1, 6-2
2025-10-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesGabriela Ghita / Gabriel Ghita vs Rina Dyer / Procter Fishburne6-2, 6-4
2025-09-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Gabriela Ghita vs John Kim / Julie Kratzer6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Gabriela Ghita
63W–31L career
1%87%13%
3.90

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.